A published rubric. Blind scoring. Independent audit.
SAREA is designed to be above reproach — credibility is the programme's most valuable asset. The full eligibility framework, scoring rubric and governance model are published below.
Baseline eligibility
Scoring rubric
Each dimension is scored independently on a 1–10 scale by the judging panel, with the following weightings applied.
The four-phase process
- 01Open Nominations8 weeks
Online portal opens for self-nominations and third-party nominations. Nominators submit company profile, FFC copy, supporting documents, metrics and a 500-word motivation.
- 02Shortlisting3 weeks
An independent panel reviews submissions against baseline eligibility. The top 5 nominees per category are announced as finalists and receive a digital SAREA Finalist badge.
- 03Judging4 weeks
A panel of 7–10 judges scores entries blindly — firm names and logos removed. Public online voting contributes 20% of the score in selected categories.
- 04Gala Awards CeremonyOne night
Winners are announced live — no pre-notification — and receive a physical SAREA trophy, digital assets and media coverage. All finalists receive certificates and digital badges.
Designed to be above reproach.
- ●Independent Advisory Board of 5–7 respected industry figures, including a retired PPRA official, a property academic and a consumer advocate.
- ●Published judging rubric available to all entrants before nominations open — no surprises.
- ●Blind scoring — firm names and logos removed before entries reach judges.
- ●Third-party auditor sign-off on the scoring process.
- ●Mandatory conflict-of-interest declarations from all judges, with enforced recusal.
- ●No pay-to-win mechanism — nomination fees are administrative only; judges never see fee tier.
- ●Annual post-event transparency report published for industry scrutiny.
